Description
In light of AI fundamentally changing how artists’ work is valued and created, we hosted a series of creative assemblies bringing artists, technologists, and media executives together to discuss consent, attribution, and compensation — so that future policy can meaningfully address their concerns.
Insights from the Hollywood assemblies were cited by the California Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing on AI and copyright, and carried into the UN multilateral dialogue preceding the July 2026 Geneva convening through the PAVE case book.
That work now feeds an interdisciplinary report in progress with USC Gould School of Law, building off Copyforward, where legal scholars, artists, and guild representatives mapped where IP law is failing creatives and drafted model contract clauses to make opting out enforceable.